Headshot of Amy Arnsten.

Amy F.T. Arnsten

Albert E. Kent Professor of Neuroscience
Yale University

Amy F.T. Arnsten is Albert E. Kent Professor of Neuroscience at Yale University. She studies the molecular regulation of higher cortical circuits in primates, working to identify the unique mechanisms needed for higher cognition that also confer vulnerability to stress, inflammation and aging, which increase the risk of cognitive disorders such as schizophrenia and Alzheimer’s disease.

Arnsten received her B.A. in neuroscience with honors from Brown University in 1976 and her Ph.D. in neuroscience from the University of California, San Diego in 1981, with postdoctoral fellowships at the University of Cambridge with Susan Iversen, and then at Yale University with Patricia Goldman-Rakic. She became assistant professor at Yale in 1986.

She is a member of the National Academy of Medicine and received the Goldman-Rakic Prize for Outstanding Achievement in Cognitive Neuroscience. Much of her research focuses on the prefrontal cortex, a recently evolved brain region that subserves higher cognition and top-down control, comparing this cortex with the vulnerable entorhinal cortex and the resilient primary visual cortex. Her lab discovered the narrow inverted U in both dopamine and noradrenergic actions in the prefrontal cortex, and the intracellular signaling mechanisms that take the prefrontal cortex “off-line” during uncontrollable stress exposure that drives atrophy and tau hyperphosphorylation. Arnsten’s research has led to the development of guanfacine (Intuniv) for the treatment of attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder and other prefrontal conditions. Her recent work includes studies on treating the cognitive deficits of long COVID and delirium.

Explore more from The Transmitter

Error equation predicts brain’s ability to generalize

Four statistical measurements of neural network geometry capture how well brains and artificial networks use what they already know to solve new problems, a study suggests.

By Natalia Mesa
10 April 2026 | 5 min read

Embrace complexity to improve the translatability of basic neuroscience

Researchers must learn to view heterogeneity as an essential feature of the systems they study and a central consideration in experimental design, not a variable to control for or reduce.

By Linda Douw, Klaus Eyer, Lara Keuck
9 April 2026 | 5 min read

Romain Brette reveals fundamental flaws in commonly assumed neuroscience concepts

His new book, “The Brain, In Theory,” offers alternatives to many of the computer science frameworks currently driving theoretical neuroscience.

By Paul Middlebrooks
8 April 2026 | 131 min listen