Ivan Oransky is editor-in-chief of The Transmitter, having previously served in editorial leadership roles at outlets including Medscape, Reuters Health and Scientific American. He is a distinguished journalist-in-residence at New York University’s Arthur L. Carter Journalism Institute, where he teaches medical journalism, and co-founder of Retraction Watch, which reports on scientific retractions.
Ivan Oransky
Editor-in-chief
The Transmitter
”Our goal for The Transmitter is ambitious but clear. We aspire to become an essential resource for neuroscientists at all career stages, and to help them stay current and build connections.
From this contributor
Neuroscientist Gerry Fischbach, in his own words
By
Ivan Oransky
30 May 2025 | 2 min read
Journal retracts paper on plant beauty that cited autism study
By
Ivan Oransky
25 April 2022 | 2 min read
Education
- M.D., New York University
- B.A. in biology, Harvard University
Articles
- “Punishing misconduct: Sanctions for fraudulent research in anesthesia and beyond” | Anesthesia & Analgesia
- “Rooting out scientific misconduct” | Science
- “Please don’t cite this editorial” | Journal of Clinical Anesthesia
- “The scientific literature can’t save you now” | The Atlantic
- “Taking it back: A pilot study of a rubric measuring retraction notice quality” | Accountability in Research
- “Data sleuths’ work is thankless. They must get credit for retractions” | Times Higher Education
- “Retractions are increasing, but not enough” | Nature
- “How bibliometrics and school rankings reward unreliable science” | The BMJ
- “Institutional research misconduct reports need more credibility” | JAMA
- “Science corrects itself, right? A scandal at Stanford says it doesn’t” | Scientific American
- “Reasonable versus unreasonable doubt” | American Scientist
Book chapters
- “Journals, peer review, and preprints,” in “A Tactical Guide to Science Journalism: Lessons From the Front Lines”
- “Retraction Watch: What we’ve learned and how metrics play a role,” in “Gaming the Metrics: Misconduct and Manipulation in Academic Research”
- “Pseudoscience, coming to a peer-reviewed journal near you,” in “Pseudoscience: The Conspiracy Against Science”
- “Will improvements in health journalism improve health literacy?” in “Volume 269: Health Literacy in Clinical Practice and Public Health”
Explore more from The Transmitter
Future of AI brain models sparks debate
Neuroscientists are divided about whether foundation models that predict brain responses will help the field understand how brains work.
Future of AI brain models sparks debate
Neuroscientists are divided about whether foundation models that predict brain responses will help the field understand how brains work.
By
Natalia Mesa
11 November 2026 | 10 min read
Language development during the first 1,000 days; and more
Here is a roundup of autism-related news and research spotted around the web for the week of 9 November.
Language development during the first 1,000 days; and more
Here is a roundup of autism-related news and research spotted around the web for the week of 9 November.
By
Jill Adams
10 November 2026 | 2 min read
What ‘Brain Flows’ gets right
Michael W. Cole’s new book makes a convincing case that the dynamic movement of signals underpins just about everything the brain does, though it misses mention of relevant theoretical and single-cell work.
What ‘Brain Flows’ gets right
Michael W. Cole’s new book makes a convincing case that the dynamic movement of signals underpins just about everything the brain does, though it misses mention of relevant theoretical and single-cell work.
By
Daniel Graham
10 November 2026 | 6 min read