Peter H.R. Green is director of the Celiac Disease Center at Columbia University. He is Ivan and Phyllis Seidenberg Professor of Medicine at Columbia University and attending physician at the Columbia University Medical Center (New York-Presbyterian Hospital). He is also co-author of “Celiac Disease: A Hidden Epidemic.”
Peter H.R. Green
Phyllis & Ivan Seidenberg Professor of Medicine, Columbia University
Celiac Disease Center at Columbia University
From this contributor
Going gluten-free unlikely to help most people with autism
The presence of antibodies against a wheat protein may indicate that a child with autism would benefit from a gluten-free diet — but little data support this theory.
Going gluten-free unlikely to help most people with autism
By
Peter H.R. Green, Rory Jones
26 July 2016 | 6 min read
Explore more from The Transmitter
Machine learning spots neural progenitors in adult human brains
But the finding has not settled the long-standing debate over the existence and extent of neurogenesis during adulthood, says Yale University neuroscientist Juan Arellano.
Machine learning spots neural progenitors in adult human brains
But the finding has not settled the long-standing debate over the existence and extent of neurogenesis during adulthood, says Yale University neuroscientist Juan Arellano.
By
Claudia López Lloreda
3 July 2025 | 7 min listen
Xiao-Jing Wang outlines the future of theoretical neuroscience
Wang discusses why he decided the time was right for a new theoretical neuroscience textbook and how bifurcation is a key missing concept in neuroscience explanations.
Xiao-Jing Wang outlines the future of theoretical neuroscience
Wang discusses why he decided the time was right for a new theoretical neuroscience textbook and how bifurcation is a key missing concept in neuroscience explanations.
By
Paul Middlebrooks
2 July 2025 | 112 min listen
Memory study sparks debate over statistical methods
Critics of a 2024 Nature paper suggest the authors failed to address the risk of false-positive findings. The authors argue more rigorous methods can result in missed leads.
Memory study sparks debate over statistical methods
Critics of a 2024 Nature paper suggest the authors failed to address the risk of false-positive findings. The authors argue more rigorous methods can result in missed leads.
By
Katie Moisse
2 July 2025 | 5 min read