Stephanie Chan

Research Scientist
DeepMind

Stephanie Chan performs research at the intersection of artificial intelligence and neuroscience, as a research scientist at DeepMind. She completed her Ph.D. in neuroscience at Princeton University. She completed B.S. degrees in physics and in brain and cognitive sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where she developed a patented gene therapy injector array for the brain, under the supervision of Edward Boyden. She completed her Ph.D. in neuroscience at Princeton University, under the supervision of Yael Niv and Kenneth Norman.

Chan’s thesis work focused on combining behavioral models with computational analyses of functional magnetic resonance imaging data to uncover evidence about algorithms employed by the brain in learning, memory and decision-making. Recently, she has worked in research and development in psychology, neuroscience and machine learning at startups based in Boston, Barcelona and Hong Kong.

In the past, Chan worked on a planning committee for the Massachusetts Down Syndrome Congress to create a statewide program for teens and young adults with Down syndrome. More recently, her work has included the development of technologies for automatically inferring emotions, for typical populations as well as for individuals with conditions such as Down syndrome and autism.

Explore more from The Transmitter

Stock photo of a group of neurons.

Finding neuroheterogeneity’s sweet spot

Once thought to be detrimental to memory processing, neuronal diversity—at the right ‘Goldilocks’ dose—is a new boon to theoretical neuroscience.

By Natalia Mesa
20 October 2026 | 7 min read
Illustration of an open journal featuring lines of text and small illustrations of eyes and mouths.

COVID-19 and influenza effects in pregnancy; and more

Here is a roundup of autism-related news and research spotted around the web for the week of 19 October.

By Jill Adams
20 October 2026 | 2 min read
Illustration of a person standing in a crumbling room with papers and strings on the wall, a fallen chair, and a lamp.

What to do when traditional mechanistic approaches no longer work

Many complex behaviors have stubbornly resisted mechanistic explanations. Deciphering them will require new approaches—and perhaps a new concept of “understanding.”

By Bence Ölveczky
19 October 2026 | 8 min read