Stephanie Chan

Research Scientist
DeepMind

Stephanie Chan performs research at the intersection of artificial intelligence and neuroscience, as a research scientist at DeepMind. She completed her Ph.D. in neuroscience at Princeton University. She completed B.S. degrees in physics and in brain and cognitive sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where she developed a patented gene therapy injector array for the brain, under the supervision of Edward Boyden. She completed her Ph.D. in neuroscience at Princeton University, under the supervision of Yael Niv and Kenneth Norman.

Chan’s thesis work focused on combining behavioral models with computational analyses of functional magnetic resonance imaging data to uncover evidence about algorithms employed by the brain in learning, memory and decision-making. Recently, she has worked in research and development in psychology, neuroscience and machine learning at startups based in Boston, Barcelona and Hong Kong.

In the past, Chan worked on a planning committee for the Massachusetts Down Syndrome Congress to create a statewide program for teens and young adults with Down syndrome. More recently, her work has included the development of technologies for automatically inferring emotions, for typical populations as well as for individuals with conditions such as Down syndrome and autism.

Explore more from The Transmitter

Man with EEG sensors on his head.

Noninvasive technologies can map and target human brain with unprecedented precision

But to fully grasp the tools’ potential, we need to better understand how electric and magnetic fields interact with the brain.

By Bruce Rosen
21 April 2025 | 7 min read
Research image of fMRI scans showing decision-making across individuals.

During decision-making, brain shows multiple distinct subtypes of activity

Person-to-person variability in brain activity might represent meaningful differences in cognitive processes, rather than random noise.

By Claudia López Lloreda
18 April 2025 | 5 min read
Tic-tac-toe board with pills representing x’s and o’s.

Basic pain research ‘is not working’: Q&A with Steven Prescott and Stéphanie Ratté

Prescott and Ratté critique the clinical relevance of preclinical studies in the field and highlight areas for improvement.

By Sydney Wyatt
18 April 2025 | 7 min read