Stephanie Chan

Research Scientist
DeepMind

Stephanie Chan performs research at the intersection of artificial intelligence and neuroscience, as a research scientist at DeepMind. She completed her Ph.D. in neuroscience at Princeton University. She completed B.S. degrees in physics and in brain and cognitive sciences at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, where she developed a patented gene therapy injector array for the brain, under the supervision of Edward Boyden. She completed her Ph.D. in neuroscience at Princeton University, under the supervision of Yael Niv and Kenneth Norman.

Chan’s thesis work focused on combining behavioral models with computational analyses of functional magnetic resonance imaging data to uncover evidence about algorithms employed by the brain in learning, memory and decision-making. Recently, she has worked in research and development in psychology, neuroscience and machine learning at startups based in Boston, Barcelona and Hong Kong.

In the past, Chan worked on a planning committee for the Massachusetts Down Syndrome Congress to create a statewide program for teens and young adults with Down syndrome. More recently, her work has included the development of technologies for automatically inferring emotions, for typical populations as well as for individuals with conditions such as Down syndrome and autism.

Explore more from The Transmitter

Research image of a variety of brain atlases.

New ‘decoder’ tool translates functional neuroimaging terms across labs

The compendium of brain-parcellation atlases makes it possible to compare large-scale network data, which often involves different and overlapping network names.

By Holly Barker
23 July 2024 | 4 min read
Research image showing connectivity in brain regions in female mice with and without a UBE3A variant.

CNTNAP2 variants; trait trajectories; sensory reactivity

Here is a roundup of autism-related news and research spotted around the web for the week of 22 July.

By Jill Adams
23 July 2024 | 2 min read

Women are systematically under-cited in neuroscience. New tools can change that.

An omitted citation in a high-profile paper led us to examine our own practices and to help others adopt tools that promote citation diversity.

By Anne Churchland, Felicia Davatolhagh
22 July 2024 | 5 min read