Self destruction: Antibodies carried in the blood of mothers of children with autism, but not those of mothers of typically developing children attack proteins in mouse brains.

Maternal anti-brain antibodies may play a role in autism

Maternal antibodies that attack fetal brain proteins could underlie some cases of autism, says immunologist Betty Diamond.

By Betty Diamond, Peter Gregersen, Lior Brimberg
21 February 2012 | 6 min read
This article is more than five years old.
Neuroscience—and science in general—is constantly evolving, so older articles may contain information or theories that have been reevaluated since their original publication date.

The possibility that autoimmune mechanisms are a contributing factor in autism spectrum disorders has been entertained for decades, ever since early studies suggested that individuals with autism have a family history of autoimmune disease1,2.

Much of the early data were acquired from a fairly small number of individuals with autism. However, a 2009 Danish study examined autoimmune disorders in more than 600,000 children born between 1993 and 2004, and found an association between autism and both rheumatoid arthritis and celiac disease1. In fact, the study concluded that the risk of autism more than doubles for children who have a mother with one of these disorders.

The presence of autoantibodies, which are immune proteins that mistakenly attack the body’s own cells, in both diseases raises the possibility of a relationship between maternal autoantibodies and autism. In this model, maternal autoantibodies cross the placenta and enter the fetal brain, leading to alterations in its development. A variety of data published in the past few years provide evidence that such a model is biologically plausible.

The passage of maternal antibodies across the placenta is a well-known mechanism for fetal immune protection. Maternal antibodies reach all fetal tissues, even the brain. In adults, the entry of circulating soluble molecules and cells into brain tissue is limited by the blood-brain barrier, but in recent years it has become increasingly clear that the brain is less of an immune-privileged organ than it was previously considered to be.

In the fetus, the blood-brain barrier is not fully formed, making the developing brain vulnerable to blood-borne substances. In fact, acquired changes or genetic impairments in cognition and behavior have been shown to be a consequence of circulating brain-specific antibodies that can alter function if they gain access to brain tissue3.

Case studies:

The children of individuals with systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) provide compelling data supporting this hypothesis. Congenital heart block, a type of arrhythmia, and skin rash are clearly transmissible to children by autoantibodies that are commonly present in women who have SLE.

The children of women with SLE also have a high incidence of learning disorders4. This effect has been linked to autoantibodies in mice, but not in humans, however. Intriguingly, many anti-DNA antibodies that are characteristic of SLE cross-react with the N-methyl-D-aspartate receptor (NMDAR), which is involved in learning and memory5.

We have shown that pregnant female mice harboring DNA- and NMDAR-specific antibodies have pups with abnormal fetal brain development. When the pups are born, their reflexes don’t develop as quickly as those of controls and, as adults, they have selected impairments in cognitive tasks6.

Several investigators have identified the presence of antibodies that bind to human fetal brain tissue in a subset of women who have children with autism7,8. When researchers gave these antibodies to pregnant mice and monkeys, they caused abnormal behavior in their offspring9.

In a 2003 study, researchers gave serum with anti-brain antibodies from mothers of children with autism to pregnant mice. The offspring had deficits in social behavior and motor skills, as well as cerebellar abnormalities10.

In a subsequent study, pregnant mice were given immunoglobulin antibodies isolated from the blood of mothers of children with autism. In this case, the offspring were more anxious during adolescence, had alterations in sociability and were more sensitive to noise than controls were11.

Researchers have also administered similar antibodies to pregnant rhesus monkeys. The offspring have more social deficits, motor activity and repetitive behaviors compared with offspring born to monkeys given immunoglobulin from mothers of typically developing children12.

The results from these studies suggest that maternal antibodies targeting the brain can affect brain development in their offspring, resulting in altered cognition, behavior and motor skills.

Risk rate:

By studying families in the Simons Simplex Collection (SSC), we have confirmed that mothers of children with autism are five times more likely to have anti-brain antibodies than are members of a control group consisting of healthy women of childbearing age. The SSC is a database of genetic and clinical information from families that have one child with autism, and unaffected parents and siblings, funded by’s parent organization.

Anti-nuclear antibodies, which are directed against the cell’s nucleus, are characteristic of many autoimmune diseases. We found that they are elevated in the blood of mothers of children with autism who also carry anti-brain antibodies compared with those who do not have anti-brain antibodies. This is consistent with the theory that autoimmunity predisposes mothers to having brain-reactive antibodies and giving birth to children with autism.

Interestingly, women with rheumatoid arthritis are as likely to have anti-brain antibodies as are mothers of children with autism. We are investigating whether genetic variants that have been linked to rheumatic arthritis and celiac disease are present in women who have both anti-brain antibodies and a child with autism.

Confirming an immune mechanism for some proportion of autism cases may help identify at-risk pregnancies, by allowing pregnant women or women planning to become pregnant to be screened for harmful anti-brain antibodies. It could eventually lead to the development of drugs that block these antibodies, thereby preventing autism from developing in vulnerable children.

These observations suggest that genetic studies in autism should be integrated with investigations into environmental exposures, including the maternal immune repertoire, in order to fully understand the genetic susceptibility of autism. Studying the targets of harmful anti-brain antibodies may also provide insights into disease mechanisms and pathways — which is a top priority for our future studies.

Betty Diamond is head of the Center for Autoimmune and Musculoskeletal Disorders at The Feinstein Institute for Medical Research in Long Island, New York. Lior Brimberg is a postdoctoral fellow in her laboratory. Peter Gregersen is head of the Robert S. Boas Center for Genomics and Human Genetics at the Feinstein Institute.


1: Atladóttir H.O. et al. Pediatrics 124, 687-694 (2009) PubMed

2: Keil A. et al. Epidemiology 21, 805-808 (2010) PubMed

3: Diamond B. et al. Nat. Rev. Immunol. 9, 449-456 (2009) PubMed

4: Lahita R.G. Psychoneuroendocrinology 13, 385-396 (1988) PubMed

5: DeGiorgio L.A. et al. Nat. Med. 7, 1189-1193 (2001) PubMed

6: Lee J.Y. et al. Nat. Med. 15, 91-96 (2009) PubMed

7: Croen L.A. et al.. Biol. Psychiatry 64, 583-588 (2008) PubMed

8: Singer H.S. et al. J. Neuroimmunol. 194, 165-172 (2008) PubMed

9: Enstrom A.M. et al. Curr. Opin. Investig. Drugs 10, 463-473 (2009) PubMed

10: Dalton P. et al. Ann. Neurol. 53, 533-537 (2003) PubMed

11: Singer H.S. et al. J. Neuroimmunol. 211, 39-48 (2009) PubMed

12: Martin L.A. et al. Brain Behav. Immun. 22, 806-816 (2008) PubMed