Method provides reference map for brain connectivity patterns

A new mathematical method helps researchers understand how brain connectivity in individuals varies from group norms.

By Kate Yandell
19 November 2014 | 2 min read
This article is more than five years old.
Neuroscience—and science in general—is constantly evolving, so older articles may contain information or theories that have been reevaluated since their original publication date.

Network hubs: Researchers used magnetoencephalography data from 40 typically developing boys to identify ten ‘connectivity modules.’

A new mathematical method helps researchers understand how brain connectivity in individuals varies from group norms.The technique, reported 17 September at an imaging conference in Boston, could help autism researchers spot distinct patterns in brain imaging data1.

The research team that developed the approach set out to find a simple way to represent characteristic patterns of brain connectivity within groups. They also wanted to show which subsets of connections are salient in certain individuals.

The method entails first parsing the plethora of connections in the brain into a handful of ‘connectivity modules.’ The researchers define these modules as brain regions that are more connected within themselves than they are to other brain regions.Once the researchers establish these modules for a given group, they can assign individual connectivity scores that reflect the level of connectivity within and between the modules.

The researchers tested this approach using magnetoencephalography data from 37 boys with autism and 40 controls, all between the ages of 6 and 14 years. This technique measures magnetic activity in the brain caused by the firing of neurons.The researchers acquired the measurements while the boys’ brains were at rest.

The team assessed connectivity between 202 regions in each boy’s brain and used data from the 40 controls to categorize the connections into ten typical network modules. They then assessed connectivity within each module and among modules for each child.

Boys with autism tend to show diminished long-range connections and relatively high numbers of short-range connections — a finding consistent with some previous reports.

The researchers say their method should make it easier to establish basic connectivity norms and then show where individual deficits lie. This may also help them understand whether specific connectivity deficits exist in subgroups of people with autism.

For instance, certain social deficits may correlate with patterns of under- or over-connectivity. Researchers may even be able to recruit children for studies and clinical trials based on their connectivity patterns.

The tool can also help researchers analyze connectivity data from functional magnetic resonance imaging or better understand structural connectivity as measured by diffusion tensor imaging. The researchers are using their tool to analyze data derived from all three of these imaging methods in a larger group of children.


1. Ghanbari Y. et al. Med. Image Comput. Assist. Interv. 17, 113-120 (2014) PubMed