Headshot of Benjamin Young.

Benjamin Young

Associate professor of philosophy
University of Nevada, Reno

Benjamin Young is associate professor and director of graduate studies in philosophy at the University of Nevada, Reno. He is also a member of the graduate faculty in interdisciplinary neuroscience at the university’s Institute for Neuroscience. Previously he held a Kreitman Postdoctoral Fellowship in the Department of Brain and Cognitive Sciences at Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, as well as a visiting assistant professorship and postdoctoral fellowship in the Department of Cognitive Science at Hebrew University. Young conducts research at the intersection of cognitive neuroscience and philosophy, with a particular emphasis on olfaction.

Young’s book “Stinking Philosophy!” (MIT Press, 2024) brings together more than a decade of research on olfactory philosophy. His research on non-conceptual content, qualitative consciousness in the absence of awareness, and the perceptible objects of smell have appeared in journals such as Mind & Language, Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly and Philosophical Studies. Additionally, he is co-editor of the textbook “Mind, Cognition, and Neuroscience” (Routledge, 2022) and the collection “Theoretical Perspectives on Smell” (Routledge, 2023). Young is currently working on a book about the unconscious and our sense of self, tentatively titled “Don’t Tell Anyone.”

Explore more from The Transmitter

Tick on a leaf raises its forelegs.

Neuro’s ark: Spying on the secret sensory world of ticks

Carola Städele, a self-proclaimed “tick magnet,” studies the arachnids’ sensory neurobiology—in other words, how these tiny parasites zero in on their next meal.

By Calli McMurray
3 March 2026 | 6 min read
Research image of mice brains.

Autism in old age, and more

Here is a roundup of autism-related news and research spotted around the web for the week of 2 March.

By Jill Adams
3 March 2026 | 1 min read
Sheet of paper with a red pencil struck through it.

Lack of reviewers threatens robustness of neuroscience literature

Simple math suggests that small groups of scientists can significantly bias peer review.

By Jakob Voigts
2 March 2026 | 14 min read

privacy consent banner

Privacy Preference

We use cookies to provide you with the best online experience. By clicking “Accept All,” you help us understand how our site is used and enhance its performance. You can change your choice at any time. To learn more, please visit our Privacy Policy.