Headshot of Dani S. Bassett.

Dani S. Bassett

J. Peter Skirkanich Professor
University of Pennsylvania

Dani Bassett is J. Peter Skirkanich Professor at the University of Pennsylvania, with appointments in the bioengineering; electrical and systems engineering; physics and astronomy; neurology; and psychiatry departments. They are also an external professor at the Santa Fe Institute. Bassett is most well known for blending neural and systems engineering to identify fundamental mechanisms of cognition and disease in human brain networks.

They received a B.S. in physics from Pennsylvania State University and a Ph.D. in physics from the University of Cambridge as a Churchill Scholar, and as an NIH Health Sciences Scholar. Following a postdoctoral position at the University of California, Santa Barbara, Bassett was a junior research fellow at the SAGE Center for the Study of the Mind.

They have received multiple awards, including the Association for Psychological Science’s “Rising Stars” list (2013), Sloan Research Fellow (2014), MacArthur Fellow Genius Grant (2014), Early Academic Achievement Award from the IEEE Engineering in Medicine and Biology Society (2015), Office of Naval Research Young Investigator (2015), National Science Foundation CAREER Award (2016), Popular Science Brilliant 10 (2016), Lagrange Prize in Complex Systems Science (2017), Erdős-Rényi Prize in Network Science (2018), Organization for Human Brain Mapping Young Investigator Award (2020), American Institute for Medical and Biological  Engineering College of Fellows (2020) and American Physical Society Fellow (2021). They have also been named one of Clarivate’s Web of Science’s most highly cited researchers for four years running. Bassett recently co-authored “Curious Minds: The Power of Connection” (MIT Press) with philosopher and twin Perry Zurn.

Explore more from The Transmitter

Illustration of cranes attempting to assemble a structure out of very small black squares.

Reconstructing dopamine’s link to reward

The field is grappling with whether to modify the long-standing theory of reward prediction error—or abandon it entirely.

By Angie Voyles Askham
13 September 2024 | 18 min read
Illustration of cranes attempting to assemble a structure out of very small black squares.

Dopamine and the need for alternative theories

Some experimental findings are inconsistent with the dominant model of reward prediction error, highlighting the need for alternative testable and falsifiable models for dopamine function.

By Vijay Mohan K. Namboodiri
13 September 2024 | 7 min read
Illustration of several structures constructed out of small black squares, with scaffolding on some of the structures.

Does a new theory of dopamine replace the classic model?

My answer would be no, but the model poses challenges that will sharpen our understanding of dopamine and learning.

By Naoshige Uchida
13 September 2024 | 8 min read