Timothy O’Leary.

Timothy O’Leary

Professor of information engineering and neuroscience
University of Cambridge

Timothy O’Leary is professor of information engineering and neuroscience at the University of Cambridge. His research lies at the intersection between physiology, computation and control engineering. His goal is to understand how nervous systems self-organize, adapt and fail, and to connect these to diversity and variability in nervous system properties.

Originally trained as a pure mathematician, O’Leary dropped out of a Ph.D. on hyperbolic geometry to study the brain. After retraining as an experimental physiologist, he obtained his doctorate in experimental and computational neuroscience from the University of Edinburgh in 2009.

He has worked as both an experimentalist and theoretician, on systems that span the scale from single ion channel dynamics to whole brain and behavior, and across invertebrate and vertebrate species. His group works closely with experimentalists to study neuromodulation, neural dynamics and how sensorimotor information is represented in the brain, more recently focusing on how neural representations evolve over time. He approaches these problems from an unusual perspective, citing engineering principles as being key to understanding the brain—and biology more widely.

Explore more from The Transmitter

On the importance of reading (just not too much)

The real fun of being a neuroscientist, and maybe the key to asking and answering new questions, is to think big and take intellectual risks.

By Sheena Josselyn
9 June 2025 | 8 min read
Research image of developing axons in the fly brain.

How developing neurons simplify their search for a synaptic mate

Streamlining the problem from 3D to 1D eases the expedition—a strategy the study investigators deployed to rewire an olfactory circuit in flies.

By Calli McMurray
6 June 2025 | 6 min read
Distorted floppy discs.

NIH autism database announcement raises concerns among researchers

The U.S. National Institutes of Health announced a plan to pour $50 million into data science projects intended to investigate the condition’s causes, but the initiative’s short timeline and other atypicalities have prompted questions.

By Angie Voyles Askham
5 June 2025 | 5 min read