mouse with a sensor connected to brain
Light switch: Turning off a circuit that connects distant brain regions improves social behaviors in a mouse model of autism.

Three autism mouse models marked by defects in same circuit

Problems with social interactions stem from faulty wiring of a single circuit spanning distant brain regions, results from three mouse models of autism suggest.

By Nicholette Zeliadt
8 November 2017 | 4 min read
This article is more than five years old.
Neuroscience—and science in general—is constantly evolving, so older articles may contain information or theories that have been reevaluated since their original publication date.
Editor’s Note

This article was originally published 22 October 2015, based on preliminary data presented at the 2015 Society for Neuroscience annual meeting in Chicago. We have updated the article following publication of the study 7 November 2017 in Molecular Psychiatry1. Updates appear below in brackets.

Problems with social interactions stem from faulty wiring of a deep-brain circuit, according to unpublished results from three different mouse models of autism, presented Tuesday at the 2015 Society for Neuroscience annual meeting in Chicago.

Inhibiting this circuit improves social interactions in one of the models, and stimulating it worsens them. The findings point to a potential target for treating social deficits in autism.

“We wanted to understand how different genetic changes associated with autism converge,” says Audrey Brumback, a postdoctoral fellow in Vikaas Sohal’s lab at the University of California, San Francisco, who presented the findings. “One level of convergence is at the level of neuronal circuit physiology.”

One of the models Brumback and her colleagues studied lacks the autism-linked gene CNTNAP2. The second is missing the FMR1 gene, which is mutated in the autism-related disorder fragile X syndrome. The third group of animals were exposed prenatally to the epilepsy drug valproic acid (VPA), which increases autism risk.

The researchers focused their attention on neurons in a deep layer of the prefrontal cortex, a brain region implicated in social cognition. They looked specifically at two subtypes of neurons that send signals to two distant brain regions: the thalamus, which relays sensory and motor information, and the corpus callosum, a dense nerve bundle that connects the two hemispheres of the brain.

Circuit similarity:

All three autism models show similar electrical properties in both types of neurons. The cells that signal to the thalamus fire less frequently than those in controls, and have lower electrical excitability. Neurons that signal to the corpus callosum are unaffected.

The researchers then looked at whether the activity of this circuit plays a role in the abnormal social behaviors of these animals. For these experiments, they have used only the VPA-exposed animals so far. That’s because, of the three groups, the animals in this one spend the least time interacting with unfamiliar mice.

[The neurons that send signals to the thalamus typically become active as a mouse investigates an unfamiliar cagemate, the researchers found. These neurons are active for a shorter period of time in VPA-exposed mice than in controls.]

Brumback and her colleagues used a method called optogenetics to genetically engineer neurons in the VPA-exposed mice to turn on or off in response to light. Inhibiting the neurons connecting to the thalamus enhances social exploration, whereas boosting the activity of this circuit worsens their social behavior, the researchers found. Inhibiting all of the neurons has no effect on social interactions.

The findings fit with brain imaging studies of people with autism that show alterations in the connections between the prefrontal cortex and the thalamus. [They do not fit with the finding that VPA mice, which are less social than controls, have less activity in the circuit at baseline, however.]

[They are also somewhat counterintuitive.] “When I started these experiments, I anticipated that exciting the hypoexcitable neurons would improve the social phenotype,” Brumback says. Instead, she observed the opposite effect.

“The next step I need to do is to understand what these cells are doing — what their baseline patterns and frequencies of activity are, and how that changes during social interaction,” she says. “Another outstanding question is whether this is specific for [this circuit], or if this is generalizable to other areas.”

For more reports from the 2015 Society for Neuroscience annual meeting, please click here.

  1. Brumback A.C. et al. Mol. Psych. Epub ahead of print (2017) PubMed