Ariel Zylberberg is a research scientist at Columbia University’s Zuckerman Institute. He studies the neural and computational mechanisms of decision-making, with a particular focus on confidence and metacognition.
Ariel Zylberberg
Research scientist
Zuckerman Institute, Columbia University
From this contributor
Is confidence a second thought—or part of the first one?
Selected articles
- “A population representation of the confidence in a decision in the parietal cortex” | Cell Reports
- “Behavioral signatures of post-decisional attention in preferential choice” | eLife
- “Decision prioritization and causal reasoning in decision hierarchies” | PLOS Computational Biology
- “Counterfactual reasoning underlies the learning of priors in decision making” | Neuron
- “The human Turing machine: a neural framework for mental programs” | Trends in Cognitive Sciences
Explore more from The Transmitter
U.S. national primate research centers face an uncertain future
The facilities were meant to last 100 years. Four decades shy of that mark, amid flatlined funds and mounting political pressure, their directors are trying to find a path forward.
U.S. national primate research centers face an uncertain future
The facilities were meant to last 100 years. Four decades shy of that mark, amid flatlined funds and mounting political pressure, their directors are trying to find a path forward.
What if nonhuman primate research goes away?
As the U.S. government takes steps to stop using nonhuman primates in research, The Transmitter investigates what that shift could mean for neuroscience.
What if nonhuman primate research goes away?
As the U.S. government takes steps to stop using nonhuman primates in research, The Transmitter investigates what that shift could mean for neuroscience.
The neuroscience questions that need nonhuman primates
The Transmitter asked 17 neuroscientists what questions might remain unanswered if support for nonhuman primate research continues to decline.
The neuroscience questions that need nonhuman primates
The Transmitter asked 17 neuroscientists what questions might remain unanswered if support for nonhuman primate research continues to decline.