Illustration of a binocular view of a hilly path leading towards a temple.
Special report: Graduate education in flux

Amid funding uncertainty, graduate neuroscience programs in the U.S. adapt

The Transmitter surveyed 50 graduate program directors to learn how they’re faring. Securing labs for new students is one of the greatest concerns.
Illustration of marble bust with pixels taken out of it.
 

Rethinking neuroscience graduate education in the age of AI

What knowledge from traditional training protocols needs to be maintained, what can be discarded, and what new types of training should be introduced? Six neuroscientists weigh in.
Illustration of a pillar in the shape of a question mark.
 

The changing nature of the neuroscience Ph.D.

The best science can only be sustained by a steady influx of early-stage scientists and the innovative ideas they bring, says Diane Lipscombe. She reflects on the loss of international students, the value of training grants, and the challenges that lie ahead for graduate education.

”As [principal investigators] become less confident in their ability to achieve funding, it makes them more reluctant to take on the quarter-of-a-million-dollar commitment that a graduate student represents at our institution.

— David Weaver, director of the neuroscience graduate program at UMass Chan Medical School

Past coverage