First up: The basal ganglia atlas is the first proof of concept on the road to a whole-brain human and nonhuman primate atlas.
Add us as a Preferred Source on Google

New phase of BRAIN Initiative spawns basal ganglia ‘parts list’

With a standardized cell naming system and infrastructure for data collection and analysis, the basal ganglia project sets the stage for a whole-brain primate atlas.

By Claudia López Lloreda
12 November 2026 | 1 min watch

The basal ganglia comprises 61 consensus cell groups, some of which are noncanonical subtypes not previously characterized in detail, according to a single-nuclei, cross-species atlas published today in a package of 28 papers by the Cell Press family of journals. The atlas surveys 1.8 million nuclei from the basal ganglia of humans, macaques and marmosets. 

“If you buy a kit to put something together, the first thing you take out is the parts list to make sure that everything’s there, and here we have that parts list [for the basal ganglia],” says Peter Strick, professor of neurobiology at the University of Pittsburgh, who was not involved with the effort. “There’s so much that will be built on top of this.”

The work is the product of the BRAIN Initiative Cell Atlas Network (BICAN), a consortium launched in 2022 to create high-resolution and comprehensive cell atlases, specifically of the human and nonhuman primate brains. After months of meetings and discussions, the group arrived at a common taxonomy of cell types in the basal ganglia based on gene expression, spatial and electrophysiology data. 

This consensus set the stage to have a common language across all of the labs, says BICAN member Evan Macosko, associate professor of psychiatry and neurobiology at Harvard Medical School and a core member of the Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard. “If we don’t have a uniform naming system and understanding, then it just makes communication really difficult,” he says. 

Leveraging this shared understanding, researchers studied gene expression, epigenetic and histone profiling, genome folding, and neuronal shape and electrical properties in the developing and adult basal ganglia. The atlas also provides fine-grained spatial transcriptomic information, revealing a stereotyped molecular architecture of regions such as the striatum, one of the studies shows. 

“It wasn’t until we could actually map it to their spatial context that you can really appreciate that there is this spatial logic to how these cell types are changing across evolution,” says Fenna Krienen, assistant professor of neuroscience at the Princeton Neuroscience Institute, who worked on the project. “And sometimes it upends our classical views of how distinct different cell types are.”

The common taxonomy and precise molecular and spatial characterizations open the door for researchers in the field to find new biological insights or produce better tools, akin to the Human Genome Project, says John Ngai, BRAIN Initiative director. “Researchers do not have to go through this whole thing by themselves,” he says. Instead, they can use the atlas as a reference without having to perform all the analyses.

Some of the data are available on the BICAN portal, described in one of the papers, or featured on the institutional websites of BICAN members. Other studies in the package include resources, tools and frameworks that facilitate the integration, scaling and analysis of multi-omic data. (See a list of all the studies.)

“It’s a new phase of BICAN,” says Hongkui Zeng, director of the Allen Institute for Brain Science, who worked on the project. But it may also be the final phase, she adds. Although the ultimate goal is to expand and create an atlas of the entire primate brain, the BICAN project, which is funded by the U.S. National Institutes of Health, is slated to run from from 2022 to 2027 with a no-cost extension to 2028, she adds.

The BRAIN Initiative is looking for ways to continue the funding for the whole-brain atlas once BICAN ends, Ngai says.

S

piny projection neurons, typically divided into D1 and D2 subclasses based on their dopamine receptor expression, are one of the most abundant cells in the striatum of the basal ganglia. This naming system has been in place since the 1990s. But the 2018 discovery in mice of a cell type with properties of both subclasses—called eccentric spiny projection neurons—started to highlight the broader diversity hidden in this structure.

The new package of papers expands that diversity even more, says Trygve Bakken, investigator at the Allen Institute, who worked on the project. For example, the primate basal ganglia contains eccentric or transitional cell types, such as one population labeled SMYD2-HTR7, that have unique transcriptional profiles that do not fall neatly into the previously identified subgroups.  

“We’re finding these hybrid types in the middle [of D1 and D2] that are kind of overturning that dogma,” Krienen says. 

Many of the same molecular features, such as the presence of the SMYD2-HTR7 cells, appear across humans, marmosets, macaques and mice, the work shows. “The basic backbone is there,” Bakken says. “That was a little surprising.”

The overlap suggests that findings from studies of the basal ganglia in animal models also apply to humans, says Charles Gerfen, senior investigator at the National Institute of Mental Health, who was not involved with the new work. “Things we find out in the mice about the connections of these neurons could be valid [for humans].”

But there are also some key distinctions between primates and rodents. For example, a population of striatal neurons in primates appears in a different part of the mouse brain, one of the studies shows. And even if the cell types are present in the same regions, the abundance, regulation and types of genes they express also vary, the work found. “At a more fine-grained level, at a cluster level, we also see species specialization,” Zeng says. “It’s really the species specialization embedded under the common cell-type framework.”

Striatum.
Spatial awareness: The striatum is structured into six molecular zones, a study using spatial transcriptomics found, highlighting the importance of studying the location of gene expression.

Some species differences are more nuanced. For example, the human striatum is organized into six distinct molecular zones, one study shows, “the first clear evidence of an architecture to the striatum,” says Macosko, who contributed to two studies in the package. “They all seem to have this zip code that specifies them to a particular area.” This architecture is conserved across primates and also seen in mice, although it is much less developed, he and his colleagues found. 

The basal ganglia’s organization and composition—particularly the abundance of glia—also varies across people, one of the studies found in an analysis of 178 adult donors. The differences held true across brain regions in the basal ganglia: If a person had an abundance of glia in the caudate, the same was likely to occur in the putamen. 

O

verall, the atlas provides “powerful information” but leaves unanswered how these cell types inform function and behavior, Strick says. To make that connection, researchers next have to study how these basal ganglia cell subtypes are wired not only with one another but also with other brain regions, such as the cortex, Strick says. “The parts list is a major first step, but [looking at wiring] is the next step.” In mice, for example, the six molecular zones described in the striatum match up with wiring, suggesting these domains may play a functional role in mice and potentially humans, Macosko says. 

As that information comes in, the cell-type taxonomy has to be revisited, Zeng says. “I don’t think our next version will be the ultimate, definitive version of the cell-type taxonomy. It will continue to evolve as we gain more information.”

For now, the basal ganglia atlas is just the start, Zeng says. One of the studies in the package extends its analysis beyond the basal ganglia into the subcortex of the marmoset brain because it is much smaller than the macaque and human brains. The ultimate goal for BICAN is to create high-resolution whole-brain cell atlases for human and nonhuman primate brains, Zeng says. “We hope to finish everything in five years.” 

The BICAN framework, with standardized nomenclature, data collection and data-processing pipelines, sets the blueprint to continue scaling up to achieve that goal, Bakken says. “It provides a really clear road map now to a very imminent whole-brain atlas.”

But the future of the BRAIN Initiative, and therefore funding for the atlas efforts, is uncertain, Zeng says. “This may be really the last major effort for [our] cell atlas, and we want to complete it with a big capstone project: Get the whole brain done. We are already very much on the way.”

Sign up for our weekly newsletter.

Catch up on what you missed from our recent coverage, and get breaking news alerts.